Erica stefanko retrial Stefanko's original trial was held in 2009, when she was just 21 years old. She was accused of killing her 18-month-old daughter, Isabella, by giving her a lethal dose of Benadryl. Stefanko claimed that she accidentally gave her daughter too much medication, but prosecutors argued that she had intentionally killed her daughter. The trial was controversial from the beginning. Stefanko's lawyers argued that she was suffering from postpartum depression and anxiety at the time of the incident, and that she should have been allowed to present this as a defense. However, the judge ruled that this defense was not admissible. Stefanko was ultimately convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 40 years in prison. However, her lawyers continued to fight for her, arguing that she had not received a fair trial. In 2021, their efforts paid off when the West Virginia Supreme Court granted Stefanko a retrial. The court found that Stefanko's original trial had been tainted by the judge's refusal to allow her to present a postpartum depression defense. Erica Stefanko is a woman from West Virginia who was convicted of second-degree murder in 2009 and sentenced to 40 years in prison. However, in 2021, she was granted a retrial due to concerns about the fairness of her original trial. Stefanko's original trial was held in 2009, when she was just 21 years old. She was accused of killing her 18-month-old daughter, Isabella, by giving her a lethal dose of Benadryl. Stefanko claimed that she accidentally gave her daughter too much medication, but prosecutors argued that she had intentionally killed her daughter. The trial was controversial from the beginning. Stefanko's lawyers argued that she was suffering from postpartum depression and anxiety at the time of the incident, and that she should have been allowed to present this as a defense. However, the judge ruled that this defense was not admissible. Stefanko was ultimately convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 40 years in prison. However, her lawyers continued to fight for her, arguing that she had not received a fair trial. Others, however, argue that Stefanko is guilty of a horrific crime, and that she should be held accountable for her actions. They point out that Stefanko had a history of neglecting her children, and that she had previously been reported to child protective services.